Spike VGX 2013 Was a Success (In Ratings) – But Should the Show Continue?

Published 11 months ago by , Updated December 18th, 2013 at 8:43 am,

Spike VGX Viewer Numbers

When Spike TV announced they were revamping their awards show, and rebranding it as Spike VGX, many gamers were unsure of the decision. Taking an awards show, blowing it out to a full 3 hours, and streaming it online sounded like a pretty substantial gamble.

Yet, the Spike VGX experiment appears to have paid off, as the show drew about 1.1 million total viewers. Granted, not everyone tuned in for the entire online broadcast — with most logging about 32 minutes viewed — but overall the show appears to have been a success.

However, that success is quantitative, and only takes into account the raw numbers, which Spike parent company Viacom is very happy with. So much so, that the Spike VGX producers are in talks to duplicate the show for next year.

But, while the global viewership was there, the quality might have been lacking, a topic Executive VP of Digital Media for Viacom Erik Flannigan, Executive VP of Event Planning Casey Patterson, and Spike VGX co-host Geoff Keighley addressed in an interview with Polygon.

Joel McHale VGX Host

First and foremost, the Spike VGX producers talked about the reception to co-host Joel McHale. McHale, a self-proclaimed gamer, drew a lot of criticism for his job as co-host. Some say that’s because gamers, at their core, are hypercritical, and were looking for something to talk about, but that might not be true.

“You take Joel’s very funny, snarky detached point of view he can bring sometimes and you throw that into a bunch of gamers who are about as hyper-critical as you can be, and I say this as a reflection of their passion and their interest, and we gave him a three hour show where they are sitting on their computers looking for something else to do when they watch. What are they going to do? They’re going to post on message boards and they’re going to tweet about it. It was kind of a formula for feedback and Joel became the place where they pointed a lot of their attention.”

While the choice of Joel McHale might not make sense at first glance, you have to consider that the Spike VGX was streamed on a ton of online outlets. McHale, like the awkward Grand Theft Auto 5 concert, was almost like a form of counter-programming, a reason for non-gamers to watch. And, as far as having McHale back, the producers say they would love to work with him again.

The show itself went off mostly without a hitch, with No Man’s Sky taking most of the spotlight, a sentiment the VGX producers agree with. That being said, it’s hard not to think that the show lacked the luster that past shows have had. After all, this is the same show that broke Skyrim, Mass Effect 3, and The Last of Us.

No Man's Sky Beach

Clearly, the show’s deviation away from live TV has changed things, but perhaps this global success might convince publishers to hop back on board. Nintendo, for example, booked their first appearance at the show, but didn’t bring anything impressive, just confirmation that Cranky Kong is in Donkey Kong: Tropical Freeze.

It seems like the verdict will always be out on the Spike Video Game Awards/ VGX, but the good news is the producers tend to take viewers’ criticisms into consideration. They don’t always replace their “bad” ideas with “good” ones, but things are changing, there’s no doubt about that. We’ll see what next year brings.

What did you think of the Spike VGX as a whole? What did you like? What did you dislike? Would you like to see another show in this format?

-

Source: Polygon

TAGS: No Man's Sky, Spike Video Game Awards

6 Comments

Post a Comment

  1. I honestly thought McHale was the best part of the whole show.

  2. After how bad the overall show was the first time I saw it, I won’t be checking back any time soon. Joel M is no genius, but I’d watch him any day over the usually awful gamer hosts and cheesy promoters. About ten minutes of highlights is probably more than enough time to waste. Not real impressed by Spike TVs lowest common denominator programming. It may not make you stupid, but it does often encourage stupid people to revel in their stupidity. How many nut shots do we need footage of people? Not a great cultural contribution.

  3. i liked it better what they were doing with the VGA. a lot of people hate it but i like it because at least they give out awards hahahaha and they show exclusives. VGX was a disaster no way around it.

  4. It was a total waste of time….total. Nintendo showed up and had…one game to pimp?!?! LOL

    I didn’t see any game debut that I was even remotely interested in and the hosts didn’t seem to know what was going on from one moment to the next. Yeah, McHale is funny to some extent but a lot of stuff he did fell flat.

    Further proof that the whole show was a disorganized mess was the GTA 5 Concert. Whoever gave those performers mics before they appeared on stage should be fired. Lord, that was cringe worthy.

    They want me to tune in again then they need to revamp the entire thing.

  5. Is it so difficult to make a decent video game awards show?

  6. I like the new format and the focus on developers. And I like McHale but there really isn’t a need to cram in so many jokes, let alone getting a “funny man” to co-host. It feels too awkward when there isn’t a live audience. But I definitely wanna see it continue, if only to give it a chance to improve itself.

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.