10 Responses to “Sony: PS3 Better for Publishers Than Xbox 360”

  1. This is precisely why I like Nintendo. When I purchase games for that system, I don't feel cheated due to the fact that they do not focus on DLC to much.

    Don't get me wrong, Nintendo also has its faults; like making five million versions of a handheld. Seriously, they need to stop beating a dead horse on that one.

  2. I own a PS3, but I totally agree with you on this issue. I don't want to see exclusive, extended content on my system over another, anymore than theirs over mine. No gamer should be punished for wanting to play a game on a system that they made a choice to buy.

  3. I agree with what has been said here.

    I don't own a PS3 and I'm not saying its a bad system at all, but to buy it only for the few exclusive titles that it has makes no sense to me when I can get the same third-party games plus better exclusives like Mass Effect 2 on a 360.

  4. i dont see what the big issue is here. i own all three systems, and i dont play my xbox at all, unless im playing mass effect or fable. but this is no difference than console exclusive games. sony has a system that can do more and is more powerful than its competitor. why not use it to the max. its called a console war for a reason. some people lose and suffer, its the rule of war. no one seemed to care when xbox was getting exclusive games and now people bitching because ps3 is getting exclusive content? if it is such an issue expecially for xbox gamers and microsoft why don't the due the same thing? and when they do because we all know they will, no one will bitch.

    BD format is significantly better thatn the HDDVD. And for the better part no one uses the full capacity of the BD format, so developers who want to use the full format may in anyway they please and if that means exclusive content so be it. and if lengthens production time then release the xbox one first when it finishes and then the ps3 when it finishes.

  5. Mass Effect 2 better on PC. Look too the future for sales not the short road. No offense. 360 great system, but in reality buying a 360 for its ok very select good elxcusives is ridiculous. Yet, as always it is up to the gamer. To some 360 has better exclusives, to some PS3 has what they want.

  6. Nintendo's lack of DLC has less to do with whether or not they'd like to focus on it and more to do with the limitations of the hardware and operating system.

  7. Even fanboys should be able to admit that Sony is a hardware company. Obviously their hardware should be much better – if it weren't they'd really have been doomed this generation.

    The PS3 definitely has legs…

  8. I totally agree with you. Its clear that the author favors the 360 too lol. From day one, Sony has been pushing their Blu Ray format and everyone laughed at them. Now when the fruits of their labor are paying off, people are complaining. I find it funny how the author hasn't mentioned Microsoft and their doings in TOTALLY ripping off PS3 owners. He bashes Sony for being smart and releasing an efficient storage medium, but when Bill Gates drops 50 mill for DLC, its not ripping off gamers? It simple, PS3 was built to last, and its becoming clear. The 360 won't be able to keep up this year and from now on, so here is a solution, buy a PS3. And yes, its called a console WAR for a reason. Competition means growth. The author has seemed to lost sight of this.

  9. Do some research buddy. “The few exclusives that is has”? Are you kidding? lol I own a 360 and the only exclusives worth noting are Gears and maybe Mass Effect which I didn't really care for. I don't feel like typing all the 1st and 3rd party exclusives that the PS3 has. And I can't wait till later this year and 2011 when all the game developers develop for the PS3 only because games cant fit on a dvd. It should be entertaining to watch the 360 fanboys cry in agony.

Leave a Reply