
Retailers are one thing – everyone needs an arbitrary placeholder for their left-in-the-dark customers after Nintendo offered no Wii U launch date at E3 2012 – but when publishers begin delegating dates for when their Wii U-developed titles go on sale, all within an identical, very plausible time frame, it might be sound to start listening.
Readers may recall yesterday’s announcement from Sega that the Disney film Wreck-It Ralph’s title character would be appearing in Sonic & All-Stars Racing Transformed. The news wasn’t a bombshell; however, the traditional press-release post-script – the blurb letting us know when the game hits stores – curiously included the Wii U with the Xbox 360, PS3, Vita, 3DS, PC in a November release window. It may seem incidental, but most statements for 2012 releases tend to demarcate the Wii U from any other platform with an “and-also-later” clause.
And then there’s today’s announcement from D3 on the Dreamworks adaptation Rise of the Guardians: According to VG 24/7, the publisher has stated that game will be available on the Wii U, Wii, 3DS, DS, 360 and PS3 on November 23 in the UK. Fused with the Nintendo Magazine listing of Call of Duty: Black Ops as a November Wii U launch title and a Rayman: Origins developer tossing the month around in June, Nintendo seems to have let their partners do the talking for them.
One possible date: November 20, 2012. When we consider that the GameCube launched on November 18, 2001 and the Wii on November 19, 2006, there’s a neatly eccentric symmetry in having the Wii U release on the third Tuesday of the month this year as well. (Microsoft employed a similar strategy with the Xbox and Xbox 360, releasing the consoles, respectively, on November 15, 2001 and November 22, 2005. Just in time for the Black Friday shopping rush.)
Regardless of when the Wii U launches, though, it will arrive with two controllers: the main, touchscreen-enhanced Gamepad and the dual-analog flaunting Pro Controller. Nintendo revealed the Pro Controller at this year’s E3 under the marketing guise of multi-platform adaptability, easing the concerns of hardcore gamers, with whom the company’s relationship has grown tenuous over the life of the Wii.
However, according to Wedbush Wii U skeptic Michael Pachter, the pro-style controller isn’t as much a fan placation as it is a corporate concession: Pachter claims that Activision essentially dangled major products like Call of Duty in front Nintendo, promising to keep them off the Wii U without a traditionally-styled controller:
“Activision never said anything to me, but I know that [for] big games like Call Of Duty they said, ‘No, we’re not putting it on there if you don’t give us a conventional controller.’ So they gave in.”
Edge reports that Pachter made the comments at last week’s Develop Conference in Brighton, where he also reiterated his skepticism that Nintendo will find success in the next generation:
“I don’t get it. I think that essentially this is a solution in search of a problem. I mean, somebody had an idea – ‘let’s make the controller a tablet’ – and there aren’t many games that are going to take advantage of that.
“I don’t think they suck – I just think that they really believe that, ‘If we’re still novel, everything we do will work.’ This isn’t going to work.
“Hardcore gamers will buy them; hardcore Nintendo fanboys will buy it. They could put out a piece of cardboard and say that it’ll play Mario and they’ll buy it.”
Ok, so clearly the Pach-Attack! host isn’t fawning for an invitation to Nintendo’s next fan appreciation gala. But any truth in his Pro Controller allegations would be a major testament to the pressure Nintendo is (or was) under from third-party publishers. Much of their E3 showing was dedicated to touting games like Batman: Arkham City Armored Edition and Aliens: Colonial Marines, and how they could embrace either control style without sacrificing any functionality. We also saw Ubisoft assert themselves as a major proponent of the Wii U, debuting ZombieU and impressing us with Assassin’s Creed III.
Succeeding a console in the Wii that currently holds an insurmountable sales lead over the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, and yet was endlessly criticized for lacking third-party support, such strategical shifts would hardly seem appropriate unless Nintendo indeed felt the walls closing in to a certain extent.
Will it work? We know where Pachter stands. But some from the third parties themselves – like Epic VP Marc Rein and Treyarch studio head Marc Lamia – remain optimistic. If the Pro Controller turns out to be a third-party beacon, assuring that the Wii U is more than a “solution in search of a problem,” Nintendo won’t be lamenting any pesky politics behind it, either.
Ranters, it seems like we’re zoning in on a release date for the Wii U – even if Nintendo is still playing coy. With that said, though, how much does the company appear to be valuing third party support in the shadow of the Wii? Will it determine the Wii U’s next-gen success, or can Nintendo still get by on its in-house legacy?
-
Follow me on Twitter @Brian_Sipple.











Electronic Arts Engineer Blasts the Wii U
Kevin Conroy WILL Return For ‘Batman: Arkham Origins’
PlayStation 4 Slogan Revealed; Next-Gen Xbox Name Possibly Confirmed
‘Batman: Arkham Origins’ Official Story Trailer: Deadshot, Explosions, Easter Eggs, & More! 







LOL! Look at that guy behind Pachter in the photo, he’s sleeping! I guess I’m not the only one “tired” of the crap that comes out of his mouth.
I really can’t take anything this guy says seriously. Especially when he says stuff like, “Activision never said anything to me, but I KNOW that…” Really? Come on, Michael. You KNOW? Give it up. I KNOW something too. You’re a clown.
I really, seriously, highly doubt that a company like Activison made Nintendo do ANYTHING. Let alone, they MADE Nintendo make a controller for their own system? It’s ludacris. The controller makes it easy for 3rd parties to port their games. More games = More money. It will make playing eShop games a whole lot easier. It makes more money for Nintendo just for the fact of it being another accessory that consumers have to buy. Unless Nintendo HATES money, it’s a no-brainer.
“I don’t get it”. He sounds like that guy from that movie BIG, “I don’t get it, I don’t get it.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1_ZEL0ehkE
I DO get it. A LOT of people get it. Have you seen those new gameplay videos from ZombiU? They look freaking AWESOME! I can not wait for the WiiU to drop. And while I’m having a blast, kicking the crap out of some Zombis, Micheal will be like “I don’t get it”.
Here’s MY analysis, Michael. Nintendo will sell a crap-ton of WiiUs. They will make a whole bunch of money. They will produce fun games that a lot of people want to play. Meanwhile, Pachter will continue to hate Nintendo. Why? No one told me this but, I KNOW why. It’s because he makes a TON of money doing it. He makes a ton of money pissing people off. The more people he pisses off the more money he makes. The more money he makes the more he will continue to do it. It’s a never ending cycle of filth that flows from his mouth.
Ugh!!! End Rant.
Looks like somebody needed to let off some steam. Lol, I agree with pretty much everything you said. Pachter keeps making wild statements to gain publicity, and I don’t agree with a lot of what he says.
He’s just a joke. He makes a TON of money making wild predictions, completely obvious assumptions and telling bold face lies. He’s like a side-show attraction, “I wonder what crazy S@*! Mikey will say next!”. The only thing he’s actually good at is making a complete ass out of himself.
I’m just sick of people actually listening to him or caring what he has to say! WHY do they??? He’s a HIGHLY paid “analyst” who is wrong 90% of the time. He keeps predicting the Big N’s “demise”, but it does not take a PhD to see that Nintendo could feasibly operate at a LOSS, for years (Yes, YEARS!) and still be a fully functioning company. The WiiU can be an absolute failure. The WiiU 2 could be an absolute failure. And when the dust settles, Ninty would still be OK! He plain just does not know what he is talking about!
My only assumption is he is trying to sway the market in his favor. He is using his “credibility” as an analyst to influence shareholders towards companies that he favors. Either that or he’s bat-S@*! crazy and I’m leaning toward the latter.
I apologize for sounding bat-S@*! crazy myself. But, I just can NOT stand this guy. He sounds like he should be some weird-ass poster on an IGN forum instead of making millions of dollars as a “respected” video game analyst and researcher. It’s Dogs and Cats, I tell ya!
Sorry man, but I think ZombiU looks mediocre at best.
I think ZombiU looks fantastic, especially the more I see of it. The graphics are great, the gameplay looks absolutely stellar and the permadeath scenario is something that is really intriguing. Ubisoft seems like they are breathing new life into a stagnate genre. No offence, but I don’t see mediocre here at all. I haven’t played it but, just from what I’ve seen, it looks awesome to me.
If Assassin’s Creed III is so great on the Wii U why haven’t there been any HD videos for us to see using the Wii U as the display console?