GameStop Employee Fired Over RapeLay Interview?

Published 5 years ago by

GameStop Logo

Note: this article contains references to, and descriptions of, the Japanese video game RapeLay.  The subject matter of the game is extremely controversial, and this article is intended for mature audiences only.

There are a number of games out there today that many view as controversial.  One game in particular has gained an unprecedented amount of attention for the repulsiveness of its subject matter: RapeLay.  A game from Japan, RapeLay casts players as a sexual deviant who attempts to rape a teenaged passenger on a commuter train.  The player does eventually rape the passenger, the passenger’s Mother, and younger Sister. Ultimately, the victims can be forced to get abortions, after which they commit suicide.  The game is not legally available in the United States.

Which is not to suggest that no one in America has played the game.  One gamer who has is Derek Littlejohn.  In fact, Littlejohn was interviewed about the game by college journalist Ann Straub for her article, “Game spurs debate, causes controversy.”

Littlejohn’s quotes in the piece include the following:

“I’ve both heard about and played RapeLay myself, and I find it as nothing more than a game.”

“If you continually suppress a country in terms of sexuality, they’ll just find different ways of exploring things themselves. RapeLay is just one of those ways of people expressing themselves, to see new things.”

“It’s relatively easy to to pirate these games, when all one has to do is type in the name of what they want and add ‘torrent’. Usually, some sort of link turns up.”

Littlejohn had been a GameStop employee for approximately two years at the time of the interview.  Shortly after the article was published, Littlejohn was allegedly fired.  Why?  The specifics have not been revealed, nor are they likely to be.  Game Rant writer Trung Bui has emailed GameStop for clarification.  As of press time, Game Rant has not received a reply.

GameStop, the largest specialty retailer in America, does not now, and never will, sell RapeLay or games like it.  To be sure, it is a title you are unlikely to hear discussed in a GameStop store.  So, was Littlejohn fired for expressing his opinion on a controversial game?  Or is it more complicated than that?

To begin with, GameStop employees, like the employees of many large chains, are discouraged from speaking to the press.  Generally, press matters are handled by the corporate office.

Though Littlejohn is obviously not a spokesman for the company (and, to be fair, he never claimed to be), GameStop doubtless does not want their name associated in any way with RapeLay.  Allowing himself to be identified in the article as a GameStop employee may have been, in terms of his career, unwise.

Furthermore, Littlejohn’s admission that he had played RapeLay and found it, “nothing more than a game,” may well have been troubling to his co-workers and, as a result, to his employers.  Rape is, sadly, not an uncommon crime in America.  What if a friend, or relative, or you yourself had been a victim – how would you feel about working along side someone who had publicly defended a rape-focused video game?

But it is Littlejohn’s comments on piracy that may ultimately have been the key issue, from GameStop’s point of view.  Having an employee, in print, note that, “it’s relatively easy to to pirate these games,” and then describe how to torrent them, necessarily runs counter to the very purpose of GameStop as a retail entity.  Piracy is both illegal and a drain on GameStop’s profitability.  Any advocacy of games piracy, no matter how tangential, simply can not be ignored by a company whose entire business is the selling of video games.

And yet.  All Americans are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.  Abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, is not allowed.  There is no indication that Littlejohn made any of the statements in the interview during a shift at GameStop.  Is he not free to speak his mind on his own time?  Whether we agree with him or not, the man has a right to his opinions.

In the end, it may be that Littlejohn simply made some poor decisions about what he said, and how he represented himself, in the press.  Those decisions may have cost him his job.  It may also be that GameStop has overstepped its bounds in attempting to govern employee behavior during non-work hours.  This is a case without a clear-cut hero and villain, and we are unlikely ever to know all the details.  Ranters, what is your take on this situation? Who do you side with?

Additional writing and reporting by Trung Bui.

Source: Giant Bomb, The Globe

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention GameStop Employee Fired Over RapeLay Interview? | Game Rant --

  • justinadward

    There are a number of games out there today that many view as controversial.The player does eventually rape the passenger, the passenger’s Mother, and younger Sister. The fact of the matter is this guy was stupid and he wants to turn his own mistake into a legal battle. He had seven days to return the used Dragon Age game for a refund but failed to do so in a timely matter. They only see a profit of a few dollars from selling a new game.

  • johnjacques

    Company will probably never release details on why he was fired, but everybody can take a pretty solid guess!

  • Dexter Sylopolous

    A company is well within their rights to terminate an employee for any reason excluding discrimination. Littlejohn is likely learning a very harsh lesson.

    There are only two ways to tell the complete truth without consequence for doing so: Posthumously, and anonymously.

    If ever asked to make a comment for the media, either identify yourself with a pseudonym, or give your comment on the condition of anonymity.

    Even on the internet, never use your real name. I didn't.

  • Jason Weissman

    First Amendment has nothing to do with this case. As referred to in the U.S. Constitution, “Freedom of Speech” only applies to the U.S. Government's actions against its citizens. It does not govern the right of private entities/individuals to censor their employees.

    If anything, Littlejohn's freedom of speech was preserved as the government took no action against him even though he was instructing the public on how to pirate the game in question.

  • Pingback: Daily (stale) bread: Not quite news for May 10, 2010 | Purple Rain IT Support & Computer Repair()

  • Pingback: Daily (stale) bread: Not quite news for May 10, 2010 « Beubo()

  • Evie

    I just looked up the employment laws in PA (where I assume he worked, given the location of the university) and it is an 'at will' state. Meaning you can get fired for any reason. And you can quit for any reason. (Unless there is a signed contract). So given that, GameStop broke no laws.

    I keep my opinion about HIS opinion on the game to myself however. Let me just say this: I'm glad I'm not his girlfriend.

  • BigE

    Jeff (and everyone else who touts the First Amendment in these situations) The First Amendment says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

    GameStop is not Congress. The First Amendment only protects you when the government is trying to censor your speech, not private parties.

  • TangoAlphaLima

    The First Amendment only protects free speech from government intrusion. Gamestop has every right to limit what their employees say. Furthermore, an ordinary clerk at Gamestop is an at-will employee, meaning that Gamestop can terminate that employee for any reason.

    You may not like what Gamestop did, but there are no legal protections for Derek Littlejohn. His constiutional rights were not infringed, and his employment could be terminated at any time.

  • Rich

    I actually wrote a post on this a while back but while unfortunate that he was fired I do have to agree with some of the other people who commented as well as the author in regards to remaining anonymous or using a generalized term like”Gaming Retailer” to cover your ass. It obvious Gamestop didn't want any association with this subject much less an employee saying it was OK. Really gray are overall.

  • Mordhaus

    “GameStop doubtless does not want their name associated in any way with RapeLay.”

    Well they definitely bloody failed on that front. Pretty much most of the internet gaming press is covering this story now.

  • edward

    First amendment only applies to the government suppressing speech, it has nothing to do with this.

  • Pingback: GameStop Employee Loses His Job Over Rape Game? | Kotaku Australia()

  • bfgjfsgjnrtj5u,

    Obviously his freedom of speech was violated, what he does or says on his own time is his business, NOT the employer! Sue the bastard company, and if that doesnt work, there the old fashioned way. Going muslim!(postal)

  • Brian

    Like he said it’s just a game.
    Actually I downloaded it. Does that make me go out and want to rape someone?No
    Like violence in videogames,some people act violently but not everyone.
    Hey if someone can’t afford a game I think it’s ok for the person to download a game for free.