World War II
For the first half of the aughts, World War II games were the menacing Panzer tank in a publisher’s army, the tip of the spear that rolled out onto the market at a relentless rate, more often than not guaranteeing a sales victory. Today, however, they’ve been reduced to a flimsy German motorcycle sidecar – and Indiana Jones isn’t driving.
It was a confluence of oversaturation calamities that conspired against World War II’s gaming dominance. Gamers grew tired of storming the beaches of Normandy in a developer’s Saving Private Ryan du jour; the European theater, picturesque though it was, ran dry of fertile battlegrounds, and the rising tide of moral ambiguity (see: moral clarity) saw Hitler, Hirohito, and even Mussolini turn into archenemy outcasts.
Once Call of Duty – after years as gaming’s standard bearer for the Second World War – finally discovered the magic formula that was Modern Warfare, there was no going back. Call of Duty: World at War was a tantalizing glimpse into what could have been – a World War II revival in the Pacific theater – but with developer Treyarch now fixated on the future in Black Ops II, their locus at D-Day +30,000 more or less epitomizes the genre as a whole.
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15View All»
Electronic Arts Discontinues Online Pass Program 
Lionhead Job Listings Hint at ‘Fable 4′ ‘Reimagining’ the Franchise 
‘Deadpool’ Box Art Answers the Question: What Does ‘Awesome’ Look Like? 
‘Batman: Arkham Origins’ Teaser Spotlights Deathstroke 
Loading ...
I had the endwar demo for quite awhile and I had so much fun. Going to buy it one day but was sad when soy took the demo down.
And you forgot to add QTE.
Back when I planned 9/11 it was a big thing, now its nothing
I just got my Xbox 360 and I’m a history buffso I ask of treyarck and activision that cod civil war is made for Xbox 360 and for all u black ops 2ers lxmustang88 that’s me friend the tag so we can talk more on this subject
Too bad most of these are wrong. Escort missions, memory cards (which take the form of sd cards, nowadays) online chat, local multiplayer; all of that stuff is alive and well. 3D? Because its not as though there’s a handheld with 3D in the title or anything
To support your point about local multiplayer, the fact remains that most of the major multiplayer games, such as Halo and COD, still support splitscreen. Minecraft on the Xbox also has splitscreen.
the jrpg has really died out this generation
Although you can say Survival Horror is dying (it never was really all that ‘alive’, one could argue), There’s Amnesia, nuff said.
Couldn’t help but facepalm at such an iconic game as XCOM: Enemy Unknown being described as a real-time strategy. It isn’t. Not in the slightest. The turn-based system should be a big clue.
One thing missing on the list: Jump and Run games! They just don’t make them anymore, and that is a bummer:-/ Or Hack and Slash, another example of a lost era (with the exception of a few games like DMC)
XCOM: Enemy Unknown isnt an RTS. RTS stands for Real-Time Strategy, and XCOM is turn-based, not real-time. Theyre completely different.
nowadays the gamers of this generation prefer the graphics not the storyline anymore
I dig most of what you said. The one thing I don’t understand is why stereo 3D failed… Seriously you’re missing something.
Have you even tried it? I mean, for more than a minute?
I consider Stereo 3D like going from a 12inch black and white TV without cable to 130 inch HD. Probably the biggest improvement ever to strike videogames. Yet most of you don’t see it, and I don’t understand. Maybe your brains are wired differently then mine.
As for me, playing a game in 2D (yeah, for me, no S3D means 2D) is absolutely out of question, completely over, no can do.
Don’t get me wrong here, it’s not that I don’t WANT to play in 2D. I just can’t anymore.
I will never buy a game anymore if it doesn’t work in stereo 3D. I won’t even try it for free. Even if it’s the best game ever. For me no S3D means no play, the game simply doesn’t exist. If S3D dissapears, I’ll simply stop playing. Yep, it’s THAT good.
he also left out playing games cuz they were fun and addictive i still play on my gba for hours if i have the free time.now theres all these “gamers” that only play cuz they think the game looks pretty.have we really become so simple minded? compare dragon ball z tenkaichi 3 to ultimate tenkaichi and u will c what i mean the new games take little effort to do anything so theres no reward of pulling off tht 50 button combo attack u been trying for an hour
There are still many people who prefer entertainment value over graphics. Minecraft has pixelated graphics, and yet it is one of the most popular games of this generation. Most indie games also have less advanced graphics, but they are still very popular.
They forgot the hundreds of memory exercising cheat-codes that were we all practiced mashing in less than 2 seconds!
What are you talking about? Clarity Moral? player choices? Mass Effect and Fallout series are RPG, well more like action-rpg….but none the less, they are still RPGs. What defines Rpg are role playing, so player choices as in evil or good is one of the characteristic of an RPG and those been around since forever (balder gates, fallout 1/2, neverwinter nights, etc”
what about single player game enhancers like action replay and game shark?
who cares what happens in a single player game? shouldnt u b able to enjoy the game that u shelled out $60 bucks for the way u want?kingdom hearts was ok but i wouldve never re-played it again if i didnt get to use my codebreaker after the first run through
Split screen NEEDS to stay. You don’t know how many times I would go to play a game touted as being co-op with a friend only to find out that there’s no split screen and be disappointed, or go to play a RACING game and have no split screen. I don’t like online multiplayer much, but I enjoy playing with other people. Getting rid of split screen is about the dumbest thing anybody could do.
A note to the writer of this article: Survival Horror is actually making a come back as a result of the efforts of independent game-makers and companies. Have you ever played Amnesia, Slender, Penumbra, or any of the other games that have removed weapons from the gameplay experience? These games make the player defenseless against enemies, creating a true survival horror experience. Not even the original Silent Hill games made the player so vulnerable; I played Silent Hill 2 and 3 all the way through without fealing any fear whatsoever, due in part to the ease with which enemies could be killed.
I think that Survival Horror is BOOMING, not disapperaing, I can give you some pretty big examples
DAYZ , this game has had riddiclous success topping the steam most bought game list ARMA since its needed for the MOD, so much so a standalone game is in production.
The Walking Dead: Not excatly a game in a traditional sence more of a point and click game, but survival horror and story elements of this game made it GAME OF THE YEAR in many awards.
DEAD SPACE: The Dead Space series is the ultimate in calssic survival horror reminicent of the first resident evils, and it takes it up to eleven.
Slender Man: This game is also anotehr exampel of survival horror, and was riddiclously popular.
Amnesia: This game made me feel riddiclosuly vunerable when playing and was very original
ok,ra,txt,me,na,no,09229730188.ok,
Yeah….that’s why main stream gaming is dying (the future lies with the Indie developers at this point). A slow gradual decline to brain death via homogenization into cookie cutter games to appeal to the masses….rather then more focused titles filling a niche and focusing more on their gameplay and character rather then shiny new bells and whistles or requiring levels of internet support that less then 20% of America has access to, or paying off that blossoming over-kill budget that requires reaching the most people possible to turn a profit.